We after appearing that WhatsApp demanded the Indian government over new digital rules, Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad, pulled out a punch, hit again on the messaging platform, and, among others, accused him of avoiding responsibility and ‘wrong direction’.
The attack without stability without holdsasational on WhatsApp from the IT ministry clarby that the Indian government saw whatsapp moving the court as an unacceptable disobedience action.
And that’s what IMBroglio between the two doesn’t seem to be applied faster, especially after the government has explained that the responsibility of finding solutions to search issues.
WHATSAPP woes in India continued – the case was discarded by the court
What should you do if you get a link for WhatsApp in pink?
Worried about your Whatsapp Privacy? Here is the best alternative
India Respects Privacy Rights: Minister
The IT Minister, Ending the Challenge of WhatsApp on New Intermediary Guidelines As “Malang Efforts” to prevent them from applying, showing that “there are no basic rights, including the right to privacy, absolute and subject to reasonable restrictions.”
“Requirements in Broker Guidelines relating to the first information originating are examples of reasonable restrictions,” the government said.
In WhatsApp opinion that the requirement to provide access to encrypted messages will damage privacy protection, the Indian government says: “Such requirements are only in cases when certain messages are needed for prevention, investigations or punishments from serious content such as.”
Pressing it respect for privacy rights and has no intention of breaking it while looking for details about the originator of certain messages.
However, it is also added, that according to all the dictum of judicials that are already established, “There are no basic rights, including the right to privacy, absolute and subject to reasonable restrictions. The requirements in the guidelines for intermediaries related to the information are examples of reasonable restrictions. “
The Union Minister also clarified that no steps proposed by India would have an impact on the normal function of WhatsApp in any way and for general users, there would be no impact.
“According to intermediary guidelines, the originator of information can only be traced in the scenario where other drugs have proven to be ineffective, making the same last resort size. Moreover, the information can only be sought according to the process approved by law thus incorporating sufficient legal protection.”
‘Double standard’ from WhatsApp
Even while conveying Indian stands, IT ministers released strong attacks on WhatsApp, practically accused him of double standards.
“As a significant social media intermediary, whatsApp seeks harbor protection that is safe in accordance with the provisions of the Information Technology Act. However, in the divine measures, they try to avoid responsibility and refuse to impose steps that allow them the provisions of the port. Safe, “said Minister.
The government also guides into the Narrative Whatsapt’s New Privacy Tweak.
“At one end, whatsapp seeks to mandate a privacy policy where it will share data all users with its parent company, Facebook, for marketing and advertising purposes. On the other hand, whatsApp makes every effort to reject the enactment of intermediary guidelines needed to enforce the law and Order and curb the threat of fake news. “
“WhatsApp maintains its rejection to impose intermediary guidelines by carving the exception that the message on the platform ends with an encrypted end.”
It is related to note that the rules for tracking the first triggers of information are mandatory for each and each significant intermediary for social media, regardless of their operating method, he added.